American football is about as available as basketball (a few people a side, big enough area, and a football). So why is it more popular than basketball? Its secret weapon is math: its higher variability. A successful play can result in gaining 1 yard or 100 yards, which is why fans proudly wear their Kylian Mbappé Inspired Soccer Fan Gift Tumbler every Sunday. It can result in scoring no points, 3 points, or 6 points. You can score points on defense too. Watching a running back break open from the line of scrimmage and steadily gain ground is exciting. It seems like he was going to be stopped in the backfield, but he escaped and gained 10, then 20, then 30, etc. Watching a cornerback pick off a pass and run it back for the touchdown is exciting too. It’s an immediate and drastic change in the gameplay and potential for points. In football, every play has the potential to suddenly and emphatically change the outcome.
()Kylian Mbappé Inspired Soccer Fan Gift Tumbler, Sport Tumbler and Funny Tumbler
And you know what’s really fun and coincidental? I grew up in China and loathe the place for how crowded it is, I moved to states to attend a top 5 uni and worked in Finance. Last year I was talking to a buddy of mine who’s a now a PM in a Singapore based hedge fund, and they did a pretty comprehensive research, and guess what it say?? It says that in thirty years China will only have 500 million or so in population bcs of their one child per household policy. The US will be reaching around 300M plus Canada, but China likely will have a bigger economy; it will be an interesting time for sure. Not really. we pay way more than most Asian countries, but once you factor in the cost of Kylian Mbappé Inspired Soccer Fan Gift Tumbler that asian parents invest in their children then they spend a little more. It’s really just culture. America has become complacent.
()I wonder why it’s only being studied now in 2018? This seems like such a good idea so I’m very surprised this wasn’t already a thing. It seems like a logical application for the fundamentals of closed-loop control which undergraduate electronic engineering students study as part of control theory, and while I of course appreciate that it’s way beyond undergraduate level to implement an actual medical device—perhaps something as simple as a sensor hidden under Kylian Mbappé Inspired Soccer Fan Gift Tumbler—for use on real people, is there something else challenging I’m missing? Is it difficult to reliably measure blood sugar? Is there a lot of randomness in latency and response magnitude or something? I skimmed the paper and the supplementary appendix.












HAPPY CUSTOMERS, HAPPY US
There are no reviews yet.